| by |
| Neil Fraser and Dr. Bob Agar |
| Australian Geological & Remote Sensing Services Pty.
Ltd. |
| 32 Wheelwright Road |
| Lesmurdie, Perth |
| WESTERN AUSTRALIA 6076 |
Presented at the Twelfth International Conference and
Workshops on Applied Geologic Remote Sensing, Denver, Colorado, 17-19 November 1997.
ABSTRACT
A major difficulty in advancing mature exploration projects, explored over
several years by many different companies, is the integration of disparate datasets. These
must be presented at the same scale and in the same format such that they can be readily
modelled and interpreted.
A methodical data compilation and analysis technique which allows the
extraction of the maximum amount of geoscientific data from each dataset is required. An
exploration model and strategy can then be applied to produce an output dataset which will
direct the exploration effort. This can be achieved by entering the data into a
Geographical Information System (GIS). Such an approach was used at the El Halcon porphyry
copper prospect near Copiapó, Chile.
All of the various datasets were digitised where necessary and were
converted to a common format. Geoscan Airborne Multispectral Scanner data were processed
using both algorithms and advanced spectral unmixing routines. Interpretation of
geophysical data in conjunction with geological and remote sensing data revealed
previously unclear relationships and when combined pointed to deficiencies in the data
coverage. Once these deficiencies are rectified and the newly acquired data integrated
into the GIS and analysed within the context of an exploration model, drill targets will
then be generated with a much higher degree of confidence than was previously possible.
Integration of disparate datasets into a common format within a GIS
allowed these datasets to be interpreted both in isolation and interactively with others.
This technique extracted the maximum amount of geoscientific information from all of the
available data and allowed many more parameters to be tested. It can therefore be seen
that a GIS can be a powerful decision support tool for project management.
1.0 INTRODUCTION
A major difficulty in advancing mature exploration projects explored over several years
by many different companies, is the integration of disparate datasets. These must be
presented at the same scale and in the same format such that they can be readily modelled
and interpreted.
The El Halcon porphyry copper prospect, which is located near Copiapó, Chile, has been
explored over many years by several different organisations. The data produced from this
work is mostly in the form of paper maps which are at various scales and which cover
different parts of the prospect. These datasets include geology, ground magnetics,
resistivity and induced polarisation. The only available digital data at the commencement
of this study was Geoscan Mk2 Airborne Multispectral Scanner (AMSS) data which was
acquired in May 1992.
This scanner was a narrow band remote sensing device which could record up to 24
channels from 46 available spectral bands within the range of 0.49 mm to 12.0 mm. These
spectral bands comprised 10 in the visible/near infrared (VNIR), 8 in the shortwave
infrared (SWIR) and 6 in the thermal infrared (TIR) portions of the electromagnetic
spectrum. The El Halcon data were collected from an altitude of 15 670 feet above ground
level which resulted in a ground resolution of 10 m and a swath width of 9.9 km. The band
specifications were as presented in Table 1.
Table 1. Geoscan MK2 band positions and band widths.
Geoscan Band No. |
Band Centre mm |
Band Width mm |
VNIR |
|
|
1 |
0.522 |
0.042 |
2 |
0.583 |
0.067 |
3 |
0.645 |
0.071 |
4 |
0.693 |
0.024 |
5 |
0.717 |
0.024 |
6 |
0.740 |
0.023 |
7 |
0.830 |
0.022 |
8 |
0.873 |
0.022 |
9 |
0.915 |
0.021 |
10 |
0.955 |
0.020 |
SWIR |
|
|
11 |
2.044 |
0.044 |
12 |
2.088 |
0.044 |
13 |
2.136 |
0.044 |
14 |
2.176 |
0.044 |
15 |
2.220 |
0.044 |
16 |
2.264 |
0.044 |
17 |
2.308 |
0.044 |
18 |
2.352 |
0.044 |
TIR |
|
|
19 |
8.640 |
0.530 |
20 |
9.170 |
0.530 |
21 |
9.700 |
0.530 |
22 |
10.220 |
0.533 |
23 |
10.750 |
0.533 |
24 |
11.280 |
0.533 |
2.0 GEOSCAN AMSS DATA
2.1 PREPROCESSING AND GEOREFERENCING
The immediate environs of the El Halcon prospect were covered by two partial scanner
flight lines oriented east west, with an overlap of approximately ten percent. Initial
image processing involved replacement of line dropouts by averaging two lines on either
side of the faulty line to calculate the replacement line values. The angular pixel
distortion at the edge of each scan line, known as the tan q effect, caused by the
incidence angle of the scan, was also corrected. Further processing involved running noise
reduction procedures in order to minimise instrument noise, aircraft component noise and
atmospheric backscatter effects. The specific routines used were dark subtraction using
each band minimum, a minimum noise fraction (MNF) transformation to segregate noise,
followed by an inverse MNF transform to reduce noise and the Internal Average Relative
Reflectance (IARR) Calibration routine.
Once the data had been calibrated, ground control points were chosen from 1:50 000
scale topographic maps to provide a ground control framework from which to warp and
geocode the data using a triangulation warping routine. Triangulation warping routines are
ideally suited to airborne data due to its variable and localised distortion as a
consequence of undesirable aircraft motion such as yaw, pitch and roll. Nearest neighbour
resampling was used as it does not alter the digital number of the pixel being resampled
(Jensen, 1986). The overlapping portions of each run were carefully stitched together to
provide a seamless mosaic image of the prospect.
2.2 ADVANCED PROCESSING
The data were then processed in order to provide mineralogical information as to the
style of alteration present. Previous work had identified argillic and quartz sericite
style alteration during geological mapping and processing of the Geoscan data using band
differencing techniques had outlined areas consistent with the presence of argillic,
sericitic and propylitic style alteration (Agar et. al., 1994). The technique employed
here was to choose alteration minerals identified on the ground and also those which are
associated with porphyry copper deposits and compare their laboratory spectra with each
pixel spectrum within the SWIR bands. The first stage of this technique is to resample or
convolve the laboratory spectra to the Geoscan Mk2 band positions. Examination of Figure 1
reveals that these minerals fall into four separate groupings given these band positions.
One mineral from each group was therefore selected to be used in a spectral feature fit
routine where a scale is calculated for the absorption feature depth, which acts as a
measure of abundance for each material (Clarke et. al., 1987, 1991). The image and
reference spectra are compared for each material using a least squares routine and both a
scale and a root mean square error value are calculated. The spectral fit is then the
scale divided by the error. Comparison of reference spectra with spectra from areas with
the best fit indicated a good match for each of the four groups.
 |
Figure 1. Selected Laboratory Spectra Convolved To
Geoscan Mk2 Band Positions. |
These spectra were then used to carry out a linear spectral unmixing
routine over the area shown in Figure 2a. This process provides a measure of the relative
abundances of each identified end member material. The reflectance at each pixel for each
wavelength is assumed to be a linear combination of reflectance of each end member
material present within the pixel and in direct proportion to its abundance within that
pixel (Boardman, 1989). In a similar way to the fit routine, the unmix produces a scale
and error value. The error was divided into the scale to provide an unmix fit. The unmix
fit and the spectral feature fit were then multiplied together to produce the final unmix
images. This revealed a very good correspondence between the top 35% of the final unmix
image (Figure 2b) with the reference spectra for the sericite, opaline silica, illite and
montmorillonite grouping. Less confident matches were produced for the other mineral
groupings (Figures 3 and 4).
  |
Figure 2. Area Subject To Unmixing Routines a) Geoscan
Band 3 Greyscale Mosaic Image b) Unmix Image For Sericite, Illite, Montmorillonite and
Opaline Silica Group. |
  |
Figure 3. Expanded View Of Unmix Images a) Alunite,
Kaolinite and Pyrophyllite Group b) Sericite, Illite, Montmorillonite and Opaline Silica
Group. |
  |
Figure 4. Expanded View Of Unmix Images a) Calcite,
Chlorite and Epidote Group b) Jarosite. |
2.3 GEOLOGICAL INTERPRETATION
Geological maps from previous work, which had identified a body of Tertiary granite
(Tg) of essentially granodioritic composition intruding into a sequence of andesitic
volcanics, were scanned and imported into a GIS. The geological boundaries were digitised
on screen using the scanned raster images as a background. These vectors were then
overlayed on Geoscan data algorithms (Agar et. al., 1994), imported into the GIS and
designed to highlight lithological contacts and structure. The geological contacts were
then modified using the imagery as a background. In this way, different algorithms could
be used as a backdrop to the vectors being edited allowing different geological features
to be highlighted. Interpretation of detailed or complex areas was readily facilitated by
zooming in and out as required. A dynamic link between the GIS and the image processing
software allowed standard image processing techniques such as contrast stretching to be
carried out interactively with the interpretation and database building procedure. During
this process, attributes were added to the spatial data, thus building the textual
database at the same time as the spatial data was being produced and edited. Zones of
silicification, including quartz tourmaline breccias, identified during ground mapping,
were also interpreted and modified from Geoscan TIR band images (Figure 5). Cultural
features identified in the imagery were also added to the database during the
interpretation process, as were drillhole locations and associated logging and assay
information.
 |
Figure 5. Geoscan TIR Image With Geology in White,
Drillhole Locations, Alteration Boundaries and Veining/Breccias in Black. |
3.0 GROUND GEOPHYSICAL
DATA
Geophysics, comprising ground magnetics, resistivity and induced polarisation was
carried out by a previous explorer over part of the prospect. Unfortunately, the digital
data from this work was not available for this study. It was deemed extremely important to
relate the geophysics to the geology and remote sensing interpretation in order to come to
a better understanding of the prospect geology and mineralisation potential. The available
geophysical data were presented as contoured intensity, colour coded paper maps related to
a local grid. In this format it is very difficult to relate the geophysical data to any
other data as a consequence of the local grid and fixed scale. To overcome this problem,
the maps were scanned and imported into an image processor. The relationship between the
local grid and the standard cartographic datum and projection for this area was
determined. A network of local grid points on the scanned maps were chosen and their
coordinates in the Provisional South American Datum were calculated. These coordinate
pairs were then used to warp the scanned images to the reference projection and hence the
correct orientation, while at the same time reducing the distortion inherent in paper maps
due to initial variations in the printing procedure, stretching and scale changes due to
age and storage conditions and any rescaling during scanning. The resultant images were
then edited to remove unwanted map presentation detail, leaving only the colour coded,
contoured geophysical data. These images were then imported into the GIS for interactive
analysis with other datasets.
Although in this format the geophysical data cannot be manipulated to enhance
interpretation as it could be in its raw digital format, it could now be viewed and
overlayed at the same scale and orientation as the other datasets and be readily rescaled
as required. In this way, previously unused or difficult to use analogue maps can become
valuable digital datasets, albeit less useful than original digital data.
4.0 DISCUSSION AND
CONCLUSIONS
As with many GIS projects, the compilation of the database is by far the most time
consuming part of the project. Once this is completed, the analysis and interpretation of
relationships between the various datasets can be rapidly carried out.
Database compilation at the El Halcon prospect has resulted in a clarification of the
relationship between the geophysics and geology. Higher induced polarisation values for
the most part correspond to the alteration strength in a similar fashion to the magnetics,
where a ring of low values coincide with the limit of the alteration. These lows may also
have a relationship with the identified silicified zones. An extension of the geophysical
coverage would be required to better evaluate this relationship. The resistivity data is
somewhat ambiguous in that at one location a resistivity low corresponds to a zone of
strong alteration, whereas another resistivity low lies outside the alteration envelope.
However, this location is covered in colluvial material which may be masking alteration
underneath this cover, thus providing a possible explanation for this lack of correlation.
It is also apparent that the drillhole with the highest copper values (H3, Figures 5 &
6) is situated where there is a high magnetic response and, if the resistivity is
extrapolated, may be in a resistivity low. It also corresponds to a zone of strong
alteration, whereas the other drillholes are outside the strongly altered zone.
 |
Figure 6. Ground Magnetics Coverage Outlined in Grey
With Geology Over Sericite, Illite, Montmorillonite & Opaline Silica Unmix Image. |
None of these relationships were readily apparent prior to combining
multiple datasets within the GIS. Furthermore, examination of the combined data has very
clearly outlined a deficiency in the geophysical coverage of the prospect area (Figure 6).
More geophysics would enhance the understanding of these relationships and would greatly
improve drill targeting.
Combining all of the available data within the GIS has defined relationships between
the various datasets which were not clearly apparent previously. Interpreting the data
within the framework of a geological model has revealed where important data is lacking
and hence where to next direct the exploration effort. In this sense it can be seen that
the methodical compilation of all available geoscientific data within a GIS can maximise
the information extraction from each data component, and when combined can act as a
powerful decision support tool.
5.0 REFERENCES
R.A. AGAR, N.R. FRASER, & N.R. LOCKETT, "The Geoscan
Airborne Multispectral Scanner as an Exploration Tool Applied to the El Halcon Prospect,
Chile." In Proceedings Mining Latin America, Santiago, May 1994.
J.W. BOARDMAN, "Inversion of imaging spectrometry data using
singular value decomposition". In Proceedings, IGARSS89, Twelfth Thematic
Canadian Symposium on Remote Sensing, v4, p. 2069-2062, 1989.
R.N. CLARK, T.V. KING, & N. GORELICK, "Automatic
continuum analysis of reflectance spectra". In Proceedings, 3rd Airborne Imaging
Spectrometer (AIS) Workshop, JPL Publication 87-30, p. 138-142, 1987.
R.N. CLARK, G.E. SWAYZE, A. GALLAGHER, N. GORELICK, & F.A. KRUSE,
"Mapping with imaging spectrometer data using the complete band shape least
squares algorithm simultaneously fit to multiple spectral features from multiple materials".
In Proceedings, 3rd Airborne Visible/Infrared Imaging Spectrometer (AVIRIS) Workshop, JPL
Publication 91-28, p. 2-3, 1991.
J.R. JENSEN, Introductory Digital Image Processing,
Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, p. 379, 1986.
6.0 FIGURE CAPTIONS
Figure 1. Selected Laboratory Spectra
Convolved To Geoscan Mk2 Band Positions.
Figure 2. Area Subject To Unmixing
Routines a) Geoscan Band 3 Greyscale Mosaic Image b) Unmix Image For Sericite, Illite,
Montmorillonite and Opaline Silica Group.
Figure 3. Expanded View Of Unmix Images a) Alunite,
Kaolinite and Pyrophyllite Group b) Sericite, Illite, Montmorillonite and Opaline Silica
Group.
Figure 4. Expanded View Of Unmix Images a) Calcite,
Chlorite and Epidote Group b) Jarosite.
Figure 5. Geoscan TIR Image With Geology in White,
Drillhole Locations, Alteration Boundaries and Veining/Breccias in Black.
Figure 6. Ground Magnetics Coverage Outlined in Grey
With Geology Over Sericite, Illite, Montmorillonite & Opaline Silica Unmix Image.
|